Topic

Study of Marxism Theories
Sort by Default Latest Most read  
Please wait a minute...
  • Select all
    |
  • QIN Shusheng, GAO Jie
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2025, 18(4): 419-428. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2025.04.07
    This paper deeply analyzes the logical basis and value implications of the scientific worldview and methodology of upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground, as well as its practical requirements in the New Era. This paper persists in applying the Marxist standpoint, viewpoint, and methodology to systematically study the worldview and methodology of upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground, utilizes the research method of logical and historical unity, emphasizes the integration of theory and practice, and employs the basic tenets of Marxism to analyze and summarize the rationale for upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground, its value, and practical application methods. The main viewpoints of this paper are as follows:upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground is the organic unity of Marxist materialism, epistemology and dialectics; the nourishment of the fine traditional Chinese culture is the cultural soil for upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground; upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground has been carried out through the practical exploration of the Communist Party of China (CPC) in its more than a hundred years of struggle, and the CPC's more than a hundred years of remarkable history is a history of constantly pursuing, revealing and practicing the truth of Marxism, which carries the genes and lineage of upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground. Upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground helps to enrich and develop Marxism, uphold and improve the system of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, promote cultural prosperity and enhance China's cultural soft power, and build China into a great modern socialist country. Upholding fundamental principles and breaking new groud demands us: Firstly,with upholding fundamental principles at the core, to always take the right principles and traditions as the foundation and firmly uphold theoretical beliefs by adhering to the basic principles of Marxism to ensure the orthodoxy of theory; to uphold the CPC's comprehensive leadership to ensure the orthodoxy of direction; and to uphold Socialism with Chinese Characteristics to ensure the orthodoxy of essence. Secondly, it requires us to focus on innovation and actively promote advancements in the path, theory, system, and culture, injecting momentum into building China into a great modern socialist country. Thirdly, upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground requires us to grasp the dialectical unity of the two. On the one hand, it requires us to treat science with a scientific attitude and achieve the dialectical unity of conformity to laws and purposiveness. On the other hand, it demands pursuing truth with the spirit of seeking truth, thereby realizing the dialectical unity of adhering to and developing truth. Not only upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground should reveal the truth, but also uphold and practice it to transform the real world by the guildance of the fundamental principles of truth and drive social progress forward in a manner that is both timely and consistent with the evolving demands of society. From the perspectives of logical basis, value implications and practical requirements, this paper offers a comprehensive theoretical exposition on upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground. It puts forward a series of innovative viewpoints, providing valuable references for theoretical research and practical exploration in related fields, which facilitates a deeper understanding and application of the worldview and methodology of upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground, thereby offering methodological guidance for building China into a great modern socialist country.
  • HE Lin
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2025, 18(4): 429-437. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2025.04.08
    The sense of community for the Chinese nation is the foundation of ethnic unity, an emotional bond of national identity and ethnic integration, and a source of strength for the continuous development of the Chinese nation. Systematically reviewing the theoretical foundation, historical context, and practical paths through which the Communist Party of China (CPC) forges a strong sense of community for the Chinese nation is not only a three-dimensional perspective for grasping the general development trend of the Chinese nation but also a necessary path for revealing the internal laws governing the evolution of the CPC's ethnic work. As the main thread of the CPC's ethnic work in the New Era, forging a strong sense of community for the Chinese nation presents a theoretical construction with threefold ideological origins: taking Marx's community thought as its philosophical foundation and inheriting the value pursuit of the “association of free individuals”; upholding adapting Marxist ethnic theory to Chinese context and needs of times as its methodology to innovate and develop the pluralistic unity concept of the nation; and drawing cultural nourishment from traditional political wisdom of Chinese civilization, such as “great unity” and “harmonious coexistence”, to achieve the modern transformation of fine traditional Chinese culture. Over the past century, the CPC's efforts to forge a strong sense of community for the Chinese nation have undergone dual tests of practice and history, evolving through four interconnected development stages: fermentation and foundation-laying, exploration and establishment, innovation and development, and maturity and sublimation. In the practical context of the New Era, forging a strong sense of community for the Chinese nation has formed a promotion path integrating economic, political, cultural, and social dimensions. This involves a comprehensive deployment and integrated advancement of four components: solidly promoting common prosperity, firmly advancing political identity, stimulating deep-seated cultural identity, and promoting interaction, exchange, and integration. This multi-dimensional and integrated practical system inherits the historical wisdom of Chinese civilization and responds to the development needs of the New Era, rallying strength and focus for the realization of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
  • XU Wenwen, ZHANG Deming
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2025, 18(4): 438-443. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2025.04.09
    At the ceremony marking the centenary of the Communist Party of China (CPC), General Secretary Xi Jinping summarized the CPC's century-long experience in theoretical innovation and explicitly proposed the significant proposition of integrating the basic tenets of Marxism with fine traditional Chinese culture, namely the “Second Integration”. Later, at the meeting on cultural inheritance and development in 2023, General Secretary Xi Jinping further emphasized that the “Second Integration” is another manifestation of our commitment to freeing the mind. This has laid a solid cultural foundation for the path of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the New Era, demonstrating that the CPC has reached new heights in promoting theoretical innovation and strengthening cultural confidence by inheriting fine traditional Chinese culture. In-depth study and a profound grasp of the connotation of the “Second Integration” hold great significance for upholding the guiding role of Marxism, establishing a connection between tradition and modernity, continuously advancing theoretical innovation, and fulfilling new cultural missions. From a cultural perspective, the “Second Integration” adheres to a grand view of history. It places the integration of the basic tenets of Marxism with fine traditional Chinese culture within the century-long historical development of the CPC, clarifies the internal mechanism of integrating the “soul vein” of Marxism with the “root vein” of fine traditional Chinese culture, and employs the methodology of unifying logic and history to deeply explore the successful experience gained from this integration. Research findings reveal that the “Second Integration” has accumulated major experience in three aspects:the subjective consciousness of persistence through collision and selection, the path optimization of inheritance and integration, and the mission-driven commitment to upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground. The experience carries vital importance for implementing Xi Jinping Thought on Culture, achieving the “Second Integration”, and advancing the creative transformation and innovative development of fine traditional Chinese culture.
  • Marxism in Contemporary China
    FENG Jing
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2025, 18(3): 318-324. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2025.03.10
    “People-centered” philosophy is the main dimension of Xi Jinping Thought on Culture, which profoundly reflecting the core connotation and value orientation of Xi Jinping Thought on Culture. A multi-dimensional analysis of people's subjectivity in Xi Jinping Thought on Culture helps to grasp literary and artistic leadership policies in the New Era and guide cultural construction in the New Era. Xi Jinping Thought on Culture, while inheriting and developing Marxist humanism philosophy, represents both a continuation and advancement of the literary and artistic policies upheld by the successive generations of the central collective leadership of the Communist Party of China, as well as a profound comprehension of the laws governing and promoting socialist culture with Chinese characteristics, thus possessing rich theoretical implications. Xi Jinping Thought on Culture is a significant achievement in adapting Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times, which profoundly reflecting the people's subjectivity through three dimensions:the subject in practice, the subject in cultural creation, and the subject for cultural evaluation. First, the people act as the principal force in cultural creation, constituting the main body of historical development. Their practical activities form the foundation of both material and spiritual social life. As the driving force behind historical progress, the people are the creators of history. Second, the people constitute the central focus of cultural creation. It is essential to consistently regard the people as both the subjects of representation and reception, firmly uphold the Marxist perspective on literature and art, and steadfastly adhere to a people-centered creative orientation. Third, public recognition serves as the fundamental criterion for cultural evaluation. The realization of the value of cultural products ultimately hinges on the validation by the people, which represents not only a market-driven selection, but also a value-oriented endorsement. Guided by Xi Jinping Thought on Culture, the emphasis on people's subjectivity is aimed at achieving the free and comprehensive development of individuals, consolidating spiritual strength to lay an ideological foundation for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, and contributing Chinese wisdom to provide new experience in creating a new form of human advancement.
  • Marxism in Contemporary China
    ZHANG Guyue
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2025, 18(3): 325-331. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2025.03.11
    This paper systematically elucidates the unique status and contributions of Liaohe River Culture in the formation and development of the pluralistic unity pattern of Chinese civilization, and deeply explores the spiritual connotations and outstanding values of Liaohe River Culture as a crystallization of joint creation, arduous struggle, and integrated development among various ethnic groups. Concurrently, this paper investigates how Liaohe River Culture, in the context of the New Era, can empower regional economic and social development, shape local narratives, and ultimately serve the significant strategic goal of constructing a common spiritual homeland for the Chinese nation. By employing methods such as historical analysis, literature analysis, and interdisciplinary research, etc., this paper systematically reviews the historical trajectory of the Liaohe River basin, analyzes the role of Liaohe River Culture in economic development and cultural inheritance, and reveals its intrinsic value in constructing a common spiritual homeland for the Chinese nation. Liaohe River Culture serves as a significant witness to and an integral component of the formation, development, and consolidation of the pluralistic unity pattern of Chinese civilization. Its historical process vividly illustrates the mainstream trend of interaction, exchange, and integration among Chinese ethnic groups. Liaohe River Culture encapsulates the core characteristics of being long-established and jointly created, marked by arduous struggle and collaborative progress, and demonstrating openness, inclusiveness, and assimilation. It embodies the spiritual genes of the Chinese nation that unremitting self-improvement and unity. The rich ethnic and cultural resources of the Liaohe River basin hold significant practical transformation value, which can effectively vitalize the local economy, promote social harmony, and empower rural revitalization through industrial development. The “Liaohe River Stories” represented by ancient civilizations (e.g., Hongshan Culture, Chahai Culture), folklore, and the “Six Places” Red Culture in Liaoning, are invaluable narrative resources for inheriting cultural genes, shaping collective memory, consolidating value consensus, and enhancing national cultural identity and confidence. Liaohe River Culture is not merely a brilliant gem within the treasure trove of Chinese culture, but also an indispensable cultural resource and spiritual pillar for constructing a common spiritual homeland and forging a strong sense of community for the Chinese nation in the New Era. Protecting, inheriting, and innovatively transforming Liaohe River Culture holds profound theoretical significance and major practical value for carrying forward cultural traditions, enhancing the cohesion and centripetal force of the Chinese nation, boosting China's cultural soft power, and promoting regional sustainable development. By examining Liaohe River Culture as a specific regional culture, this paper deeply explores its historical contributions and contemporary significance in the formation of the pluralistic unity pattern of the Chinese nation, offering a novel perspective and research pathway for constructing a common spiritual homeland for the Chinese nation. Through analyzing Liaohe River Culture and utilizing its cultural resources, this paper systematically integrates and elucidates its historical status, spiritual connotations, social functions, and contemporary values.
  • Marxism in Contemporary China
    CHEN Li, CHEN Zhaoming, YANG Haoyue
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2025, 18(3): 332-339. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2025.03.12
    The empowerment of the high-quality development of the cultural industry through New Quality Productive Forces is not only an inevitable requirement for strengthening cultural confidence and undertaking the cultural mission of the New Era, but also a important path to building Modern Chinese Civilization. This empowerment mechanism is deeply rooted in the urgent need for the transformation and upgrading of the cultural industry and coincides with the internal logic of the cultural industry's pursuit of high-quality development. Both demonstrate a high degree of compatibility in innovation drive, market demand response, and industrial structure optimization and upgrading. New Quality Productive Forces, as a new driving force for the development of the cultural industry, achieve empowerment through four key mechanisms:firstly, the creativity stimulation mechanism, which leverages advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence and big data to provide endless possibilities for the innovation and diversification of cultural content, accelerating the conversion process from ideation to product; secondly, the industrial integration mechanism, which breaks traditional boundaries and promotes deep integration between culture and various fields such as technology, tourism, and education, forming new modes of cross-sector collaboration and broadening the industrial value chain; thirdly, the resource allocation mechanism, which relies on digital platforms to optimize resource allocation, improve production efficiency, and ensure the most effective utilization of cultural resources; fourthly, the green and low-carbon effect, which advocates environmental protection concepts, promotes the transformation of the cultural industry towards a low-carbon and environmentally friendly direction, and achieves dual improvements in economic and ecological benefits. At the practical level, to effectively empower the high-quality development of the cultural industry through New Quality Productive Forces, six dimensions need to be addressed:firstly, strengthening technology application, encouraging technological innovation, and especially enhancing the application of digital technologies in cultural creation, dissemination, and consumption, to elevate the industry's level of intelligence; secondly, promoting cluster development, constructing cultural industry parks and characteristic industrial clusters to form scale effects and synergies; thirdly, improving financial services, broadening financing channels, providing customized financial services for cultural enterprises, and reducing financing costs; fourthly, enhancing public services, strengthening infrastructure construction, optimizing the business environment, and providing a fertile ground for the development of the cultural industry; fifthly, building a green system, promoting green production methods and consumption patterns, and achieving sustained development of the cultural industry; finally, deepening international cooperation, strengthening cultural exchanges and cooperation, using advanced foreign technologies and management experience for reference, while promoting Chinese culture globally to enhance international influence. Through this series of measures, the optimization and upgrading of the internal structure of the cultural industry can be effectively promoted, the overall competitiveness of industry chain can be enhanced, the cultural innovation vitality can be stimulated, the ever-growing spiritual and cultural needs of the people can be met, and both economic and social benefits can be achieved. More importantly, by empowering the high-quality development of the cultural industry with New Quality Productive Forces, the China's cultural soft power can be further strengthened and the international dissemination and influence of Chinese culture can be enhanced. Therefore, the empowerment of the high-quality development of the cultural industry through New Quality Productive Forces is not only a strategic choice for industrial development, but also an important path for enhancing cultural confidence and international competitiveness.
  • Marxism in Contemporary China
    LI Yanzhong, LI Ruixin
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2025, 18(2): 224-232. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2025.02.10
    Whole-process people′s democracy is the defining feature of socialist democracy, and it is democracy in its broadest, most genuine, and most effective form. Nowadays, Western democracy has deviated from the essence of democracy and is a “money democracy” characterized by capitalization. Whole-process people′s democracy has always applied a people-centered philosophy. This is not only a deepening understanding of the internal political development laws of democracy but also a powerful counterattack against some Western countries that attempt to criticize and contain China under the guise of “democracy”. Whole-process people′s democracy is an important achievement in the development of democracy and the political system in China, with its own unique “new look”. Therefore, on the journey of the new era, we should further emphasize the unique advantages of whole-process people′s democracy and highlight the “new” in democratic practice. This paper attempts to comprehensively explore the innovative development of whole-process people′s democracy through comparative analysis, which can provide a deeper understanding of the essence of democracy and provide theoretical references for exploring the path direction of promoting whole-process people′s democracy in the future. Research has found that whole-process people′s democracy emphasizes drawing wisdom and nutrients from fine traditional Chinese culture, with roots, sources, and inheritance. It is a crystallization of experience extracted from the combination of China′s traditional political wisdom and the latest democratic practices. On the one hand, from a vertical comparison perspective, whole-process people′s democracy has achieved the integration of cultural and historical construction. On the other hand, from a horizontal comparison perspective, whole-process people′s democracy has opened up a new path of democracy that is both unique to China and worthy of emulation by other countries. The practice and development of promoting whole-process people′s democracy is a process of development through inheritance and innovation through upholding fundamental principles. Through historical review and analysis, we should explore the practical path of promoting whole-process people′s democracy from four aspects in the new stage. First, we should ensure that whole-process people′s democracy and fine traditional Chinese culture are integrated and mutually beneficial. Second, we should grasp the political “backbone” and implement the leadership of the Party in all aspects of whole-process people′s democracy. Third, we should apply a people-centered philosophy and uphold the values of whole-process people′s democracy. Fourth, we should continue to innovate practical mechanisms and focus on transforming the institutional advantages of whole-process people′s democracy into governance effectiveness. In the new stage, by continuously promoting whole-process people′s democracy, we can continuously improve the socialist democratic system and contribute to the realization of the Chinese Dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
  • Marxism in Contemporary China
    LIU Xiaoling
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2025, 18(2): 233-240. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2025.02.11
    The Third Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China pointed out that a high-standard socialist market economy provides an important guarantee for Chinese Modernization and building a high-standard socialist market economy should be given more prominence. Building a high-standard socialist market economy is a focal point of further comprehensively deepening reform in economic construction, and it has an important impact and transmission effects on reforms in other aspects of the economic field. Through literature review and comparative research, it is found that the key semantics of building a high-standard socialist market economy lies in the term of “high-standard”, which puts forward upgraded requirements for China′s basic socialist economic systems. Systematically and deeply studying the logical implications, major principles, and key measures of a high-standard socialist market economy is of great theoretical significance, practical significance, and contemporary value for creating a New Pattern of Development, promoting high-quality economic development, responding to the profound changes unseen in a century in the world, demonstrating the advantages of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, and opening up a new frontier in adapting Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times. Understanding and grasping the generative logic of building a high-standard socialist market economy serves as the starting point of the research. Building a high-standard socialist market economy system contains triple logics: historical, theoretical, and practical. From the perspective of historical logic, it is a summary of the experience of China′s economic system reform process. In terms of theoretical logic, it is an innovative inheritance of Marxist theory of production relations. Attributed to practical logic, it is the practical requirement for cultivating and developing New Quality Productive Forces. At a critical period of promoting Chinese Modernization, building a high-standard socialist market economy requires adhering to and applying the world outlook and methodology of Marxism, which is mainly manifested in three aspects: firstly, adhering to self-reliance and self-confidence to demonstrate the superiority of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics; secondly, adhering to upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground to solve the world-wide problems in economics; thirdly, adhering to a problem-oriented approach and facing up to the “most urgent matters” in the reform. Based on a rigorous and meticulous logical system and the basic principles that should be followed, combined with the actual situation, to build a high-standard socialist market economy, it is necessary to uphold and fulfill the commitments to the public and non-public sectors to achieve a high level of market entities; consolidate the basic systems of the market economy to achieve a high-level market system; accelerate the development of a unified national market to achieve high-level resource allocation; coordinate an efficient market and an effective government to achieve high-level macro-governance; and promote the formation of a new pattern of all-round opening up to achieve high-level opening up to the outside world.
  • Marxism in Contemporary China
    CUI Fazhan, ZHANG Yu
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2025, 18(1): 56-64. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2025.01.06
    The history of the development of world civilization proves that integration and progress have always been the main theme of human civilization exchanges, and human civilization can collide and integrate and coexist in harmony on the basis of respect and understanding. Intercultural dialogue is also an inevitable requirement for human history to enter the era of globalization, which is not only an important condition for the coexistence of various peoples' cultures and traditions, but also the best choice to solve the major problems facing mankind. This paper attempts to propose possible solutions to the dilemma of intercultural dialogue with the theme of the Global Civilization Initiative. This paper first fully excavates the blockages of intercultural dialogue from the pluralistic perspective inherent in the Global Civilization Initiative:the historical stubbornness of Western-centrism, the ideological barrier of “universal values”, the self-obscuration under Westernization, and the contrarianism of unilateralism. Secondly, it explains the core essence of the Global Civilization Initiative:respecting the diversity of world civilizations, which is the basic principle that should be followed in intercultural dialogue; Understanding the common values of all mankind provides a value foundation and value principles for the development of world civilization; Promote the inheritance and innovation of excellent traditional culture, and provide general principles and guidelines for the development of different civilizations themselves; Expanding international people-to-people exchanges and cooperation has pointed out the direction of development and depicted the path of progress for the development and progress of human civilization. Finally, four new concepts jointly advocated to address the dilemmas of intercultural dialogue:adhere to the principles of equality, mutual learning, dialogue and inclusiveness to safeguard the diversity of human civilization and break the dilemma of unbalanced dialogue; Adhere to the common values of all mankind to understand the cognition of different civilizations on the connotation of values, and solve the dilemma of dialogue failure; insist on promoting the creative transformation and innovative development of traditional excellent culture through inheritance and innovation, and solve the dilemma of dialogue aphasia; We will persist in promoting mutual understanding and mutual understanding among people of all countries through international people-to-people exchanges and cooperation, and break the dilemma of dialogue failure. The implementation of the Global Civilization Initiative can promote civilizations to treat each other as equals in the development of multipolarization, adhere to mutual learning among civilizations in the promotion of common values, adhere to comprehensive dialogue in the inheritance and innovation of civilizations, and adhere to harmonious coexistence in exchanges and dialogues, and ultimately promote all civilizations to jointly achieve a pluralistic world of dialogue that all mankind aspires to in the process of diversity, complementarity and co-molding.
  • Marxism in Contemporary China
    WANG Chen, WANG Liyan
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2025, 18(1): 65-69. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2025.01.07
    The soul of a nation is molded and cast by its culture. Culture, as a reflection of the economy and politics in a specific period, also influences and reacts to the economy and politics. In the report to the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, General Secretary Xi Jinping first put forward the significant proposition of new cultural mission. In 2023, at the meeting on cultural inheritance and development, he elucidated the essence of new cultural missions, namely that “at a new starting point, we must persist in cultivating a thriving and strong socialist culture as well as a modern Chinese civilization. These represent our new cultural missions in the new era. ” It constitutes a core component of Xi Jinping Thought on Culture, offering a clear objective for developing a strong socialist culture. At present, in-depth studies and interpretations of new cultural missions have become a frontier field and a major topic in the academic circle, and many scholars have carried out extensive and profound research and obtained rich theoretical results. Starting from three dimensions of historical evolution, goal guidance, and practical pathways, this paper makes a preliminary discussion on cultural missions in the New Era through literature research and interdisciplinary research. Research has found that the Communist Party of China guides cultural construction with its cultural missions, and has achieved the historical evolution from saving the country through culture, founding the country through culture, rejuvenating the country through culture, to building up the country's strength in culture. On the new journey, Xi Jinping Thought on Culture should be taken as the value guide and the responsibilities of upholding the root of fine traditional Chinese culture, promoting cultural prosperity, extending the reach and appeal of Chinese civilization, and cultivating a strong socialist culture should be shouldered. Cultural missions in the New Era, which involve grasping the prominent characteristics of Chinese civilization and building a modern civilization of the Chinese nation, should be undertaken. The fundamental guidance of strengthening confidence in culture, being open and inclusive, and upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground should be adhered to, to enhance the international influence of Chinese culture. A Modern Chinese Civilization should be built and the prosperity of Chinese culture should be advanced through painstaking efforts to jointly turn China into a country with a strong socialist culture and expand the new forms of human civilization. Carrying forward the historical initiative spirit and grasping the certainty and inevitability of new cultural missions based on historical inevitability can help expound on the dynamic historical development of cultural missions in the New Era, review the generation logic and development trajectory of these missions, and provide theoretical support and driving forces for their rich practical applications from the perspectives of being filled with a stronger sense of history, staying confident in history, and shouldering responsibilities.
  • Marxism in Contemporary China
    WANG Mengxuan
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2025, 18(1): 70-76. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2025.01.08
    The report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China pointed out that momentous changes of a like not seen in a century are accelerating across the world, a new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation is well under way, and a significant shift is taking place in the international balance of power. The advent of the digital intelligence era has given rise to the rapid growth of digital technologies, such as big data and artificial intelligence, and a transformation in the form of digital civilization. Global factors and technological resources are accelerating their reconfiguration. Moreover, global digital governance is confronted with multiple modern risks and challenges, including digital barriers, digital divides, disorderly rules, and unilateral governance, which impede the progress of human society towards a new form of global digital and intelligent civilization. This paper starts from a holistic perspective, analyzes the necessity of building a digital community of shared future with the common values of all mankind, explores the difficulties that may arise in this process and their causes, and proposes a practical approach to building a digital community of shared future with the common values of all mankind. The digital community of shared future is a global-oriented digital governance solution that embodies Chinese wisdom and is a concrete practice of the community with a shared future for mankindin the new era in the field of digital governance. Building a digital community of shared future is conducive to integrating global advantageous digital resources, enhancing global digital governance efficiency, and promoting the deep development of the community with a shared future for mankind. The difficulty in addressing the risks and challenges of global digital governance and building a digital community of shared future lies in the fact that there are differences in digital governance goals among countries, which stem from differences in value recognition or trust deficits among countries. Thus, finding the “greatest common divisor of value” has become the value basis for building a digital community of shared future. From the perspective of a digital community with a shared future, the deep logic of the concept of civilization and the digital concept coincide with each other. The common values of all mankind are an original value judgment, which is based on Marx's historical materialism and the development situation of China and the world. This new type of value concept can transcend specific political boundaries and provide scientific value guidance for a pluralistic digital civilization. The common values of all mankind can maximize the empowerment of global digital governance practices at the value level. An extensive value recognition can be formed through strengthening political dialogue and cultural exchanges; the dominance of global digital governance rules can be established by unifying global data security standards and establishing global digital governance norms; by creating a global digital cooperation platform and strengthening the construction of global information infrastructure, win-win cooperation among multiple entities can be achieved, which contributes to the construction of a new pattern of global digital development.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    CHEN Yongsheng
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2024, 17(6): 586-591. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2024.06.04
    How to truly meet the needs of China in the New Era by developing New Quality Productive Forces lies in adhering to Chinese characteristics. The key to Chinese characteristics lies in the “Two Integrations”. Basic principles of Marxism, fine traditional Chinese culture, and China′s specific reality are the theoretical core of the “Two Integrations”. The development of New Quality Productive Forces in the “Two Integrations” means that China′s development of New Quality Productive Forces is carried out under the guidance of Marxism, nurtured over 5000 years of fine traditional Chinese culture, and promoted according to local conditions in the specific changes in China′s reality. Under the guidance of Marxism, the development of New Quality Productive Forces must adhere to the scientific, people-oriented, practical, and open nature of Marxism; to develop New Quality Productive Forces in the cultivation of fine traditional Chinese culture, the country must continue the outstanding continuity, innovation, unity, inclusiveness, and peace of Chinese civilization; in the specific practice of developing New Quality Productive Forces according to local conditions in China, the Party must closely follow China′s new opportunities, changes, and requirements in the New Era. The “Two Integrations” is the theoretical basis for developing New Quality Productive Forces. Only based on the “Two Integrations”, can the development of New Quality Productive Forces truly meet the needs of China in the New Era, and better promote high-quality development.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    ZHOU Wenkang
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2024, 17(6): 592-598. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2024.06.05
    Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC), General Secretary XI Jinping focuses on the consideration of both domestic and international situations, examines the development of intellectual property rights from multiple dimensions such as national strategy, planning policies, and legal institutions, etc., and formed important statements on intellectual property rights with rich content and rigorous logic. The fundamental feature of these important statements is to highlight the people-oriented value orientation of intellectual property rights, the core feature is to highlight the synergy of intellectual property protection, and the basic feature is to highlight the strategic position of construction of a powerful nation of intellectual property. To deeply explore and analyze the triple characteristics of these important statements will help deepen the theoretical cognition and regularity understanding of intellectual property rights under the guidance of New Development Concept, and then promote the same-frequency resonance between the construction of a powerful nation of intellectual property and the process of national modernization.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    ZHANG Lianhua, JIANG Zheng
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2024, 17(6): 599-606. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2024.06.06
    Deeply understanding the scientific connotation of common prosperity and fully grasping the inevitability of the era of common prosperity are the foundation for solidly promoting common prosperity in the New Era and new journey. In terms of scientific connotation, common prosperity is the unity of production and distribution, productivity and production relations, which embodies the essential attributes of joint ownership, joint construction, and shared benefits, and has characteristics of universality, comprehensiveness, progressiveness, and differentiation. In terms of the inevitability of the times, common prosperity is an essential requirement of socialism with Chinese characteristics, an inherent requirement of adhering to the development concept centered on the people, a strong support for the new driving force of economic development in the New Era, and a solid guarantee for consolidating national security and social stability at the grassroots level. In the New Era and new journey, it is a necessity to adhere to the leadership of the Party, promote high-quality development, optimize the distribution system, implement the rural revitalization strategy and Chinese path to modernization to promote common prosperity.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    ZHANG Zhiyuan, WANG Jiaxin
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2024, 17(5): 515-522. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2024.05.09
    The Northeast region is an important old industrial base in China, and developing advanced manufacturing industry is the important mission to achieve comprehensive and all-round revitalization of the Northeast region. Nowadays, the development of advanced manufacturing industry in the Northeast region encounters some practical problems, such as unreasonable industrial structure, slow digital transformation and upgrading, insufficient cluster scale effect, shortage of high-quality talents, and weak green development capability, etc. Countermeasures should be taken to optimize the institutional environment to promote enterprises to make full use of production factors, adhering to the innovation driven development strategy to develop strategic emerging industries and future industries, strengthening openness and cooperation to give full play to the new frontier advantages of opening up to the north in Northeast China, actively cultivating professional talents to leverage the agglomeration effect of high-quality talents, and establishing the concept of green development to develop green, low-carbon and eco-friendly advanced manufacturing industries, etc., so as to improve the level of modern development of advanced manufacturing industries in Northeast China, and build solid economic foundation for the resolutely writing of the Northeast new chapter of Chinese-style Modernization.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    MA Chuang
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2024, 17(5): 523-531. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2024.05.10
    The Communist Party of China (CPC) has formed the strategic thought of self-revolution in the course of its century-long struggle, which not only finds the reasons for the rise and fall of political parties in the world, but also gives the “key” of how Marxist political parties achieve long-term governance. The appearance of this thought has its internal logic system. Learning from the rise and fall of political parties in the world and exploring the history of China′s new type of party politics consciously embody its historical logic; adhering to the Marxist revolutionary theory and party building theory, and adhering to the innovation and development of Marxist theory Sinicization and epochization consciously reflect its theoretical logic; acting to deal with various risks and challenges at home and abroad in the New Era and solving the “unique problems of the big Party” consciously reflect its practical logic. Exploring the appearance logic of the CPC′s strategic thought of self-revolution is conducive to draw wisdom and nutrients from historical logic, theoretical logic and practical logic, so as to provide theoretical observances and action guidelines for strengthening the Party′s self-construction and promoting the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    CHEN Xuefeng, GUO Ruru
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2024, 17(3): 265-272. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2024.03.05
    The courage of self-revolution is the critical key to keep the advanced nature of the Communist Party of China (CPC) forever. Clarifying the internal logical of self-revolution of CPC is an important prerequisite for pushing the comprehensive strict governance of CPC to depth. It is very important to grasp the internal relations among theoretical logic, historical logic, realistic logic and developmental logic. The theory about proletarian revolution and construction by Marxist classical writers and the series of important dissertations about CPC construction by its leaders are the root vein basis of self-revolution of CPC. The practice course of CPC promoting self-construction in each stage of revolution, construction and reform form the development context of the self-revolution of CPC. The century-long changes of accelerated evolution of great changes not seen in a century, the practical challenges at the critical moment of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, and the governance difficulties unique to a big party are the keys to identifying the orientation of the self-revolution of CPC. The continuously promotion of theoretical guidance, the construction of a pattern of multiple collaborative participation, the perfection of a dynamic supervision system, the establishment of a scientific evaluation criteria, and the guidance of a great social revolution constitute the practical path of self-revolution of CPC.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    ZHANG Tingting
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2024, 17(3): 273-280. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2024.03.06
    An insurmountable ecological crisis is hidden in the contradiction between capitalist private ownership and production socialization. The historical nature of the bourgeoisie's unbounded pursuit of surplus value not only intensifies ecological destruction, but also drives its governance concept to narrow anthropocentrism and ecological imperialism. The concept of Community of Life for Man and Nature reconstructs the path of reconciliation between human and nature focused on the overall global interests and the broad vision of future development of human. It adheres to the ecological and natural concept of harmonious coexistence between human and nature, the ecological values of green and people-oriented development, the ecological methodology of key prevention and systematic governance, and the multilateralism and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, which provides China's wisdom and solutions for effectively resolving global ecological problems. In the New Era, it has great significance to build a Community of Life for Man and Nature by all countries together for building a new type of international relationship, reshaping the new values of sustainable development, and building a New Form of Human Civilization that is fair and reasonable, and cooperative and win-win.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    YU Guirong, QIN Shusheng
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2024, 17(2): 157-164. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2024.02.06
    The people of the CPC in the New Era put forward the idea of “strengthening historical confidence and enhancing historical initiative”. Its inherent logic stems from its adherence and development of the Marxist historical view, reasonable absorption of historical wisdom from the excellent traditional culture of the Chinese nation, and continuous inheritance of the red gene of the CPC. Its core essence includes taking the Party′s struggle history as the source of confidence, and striving for initiative from the Party′s magnificent growth process; grasping historical trends and laws, enhancing the courage and strength to forge ahead; enhancing historical consciousness, strengthening historical responsibility, and being a promoter and practitioner of the development of human history. Its significance lies in providing theoretical basis for grasping the initiative in the struggle of ideological field, providing useful reference for promoting the modernization of national governance system and governance capability, providing ideological guidance for grasping the direction of progress and doing practical work well in the New Era and New Journey, and providing theoretical guidance for adhering to and developing Socialism with Chinese Characteristics.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    SHEN Mengmeng
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2024, 17(2): 165-171. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2024.02.07
    “Two Establishment” is an important political judgment made at the Sixth Plenary Session of the 19th CPC Central Committee, which contains scientific theoretical logic, profound historical logic and distinct practical logic. As a major political achievement of the New Era, “Two Establishment” reflects a high degree of Marxist theoretical consciousness from perspective of theoretical logic; it summarizes the historical experience of the Party′s century-long struggle from perspective of historical logic; and it is the inevitable requirement of the Party and China to achieve important historical achievements and continuous success in the New Era from perspective of practical logic. To deeply grasping the triple logic of “Two Establishment” has decisive significance to continuously improve the long-term governing ability of CPC, build a socialist modernized country, and promote the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    WANG Cheng, ZHANG Jianhang, ZHAO Suyan
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2024, 17(2): 172-178. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2024.02.08
    The concept of harmonious coexistence between man and nature is a valuable theoretical achievement in the field of ecological civilization construction of the Communist Party of China. It is nurtured in the Party′s struggle course and continues to sublimate in practical exploration, which has four profound generative logics of cultural logic, theoretical logic, spiritual logic and practical logic. The profound wisdom of traditional culture nourishes the source of the theory, the theoretical innovation that comes down in one continuous line deepens the core of the theory, the great spirit of struggle and practice highlights the power of the theory, and the ecological landscape of green hills and clear waters confirms the true meaning of the theory. Facing the problems of ecological environment, the difficulty of institutional system and the risk of clean government in ecological field, the Communist Party of China is good at seeking truth from facts, seeking institutional construction, and being brave to blade inward, which provides political guarantee for the landing and rooting of the concept of harmonious coexistence between man and nature. To implement the concept in the new development stage, it is necessary to adhere to the people-centered concept in the field of ecological civilization construction, systematically understand and implement the new development concept, and promote the synergy and complementarity of market mechanism and administrative mechanism.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    CHEN Xiaohui, LI Jin
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2023, 16(5): 439-444. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2023.05.07
    Party history study and education embodies the organic unity of theoretical logic, historical logic and realistic logic. From the perspective of theoretical logic, it is the inheritance and development of Marxist view of history. From the perspective of historical logic, it deeply summarizes the historical experience of carrying out Party history study and education. From the realistic logic, it is a strategic move to open the new journey of socialist modernization. It is of great guiding significance to deeply explore the threefold logic of Party history study and education in the New Era.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    ZHANG Juanjuan
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2023, 16(5): 445-450. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2023.05.08
    The Communist Party of China (CPC) has always attached great importance to ideological and political education in higher education institutions. As the core carrier of ideological and political education in higher education institutions, its discourse system develops with the development of the CPC and presents unique historical characteristics. Systematically organizing the discourse system of ideological and political education in higher education institutions since the establishment of the People′s Republic of China (PRC), it has gone through five stages: establishment exploration, rectifying chaos, strengthening improvement, expanding development, and adhering to inheritance and innovation. By summarizing its basic experience, the understanding of the development laws of the discourse system of ideological and political education in higher education institutions is deepened since the establishment of the PRC, so as to promote the innovative development of ideological and political education work in higher education institutions in the New Era.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    LI Xiao-yuan, XU Yu-ting
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2023, 16(2): 142-148. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2023.02.06
    The issue of people’s health is not only a political theory issue, but also a philosophical issue. It is a new perspective of historical materialism, which needs to be studied and explained from the perspective of historical materialism. The foundation status of people’s health has three logical implications: from the perspective of human history generation, social civilization development and human existence and essence, people’s health is the basis of living world. From the perspective of overall production and the connotation of modern great health, people’s health and material production constitute the basis of living world. If only the basic position of material production is mentioned, it will obscure the life activities with nature of people’s health. From the perspective of logical premise of production and the relationship between people’s health and production and life, people’s health is the first foundation of living world, which has a priority over material production. The foundation status and social nature of people’s health determine the value choice of people’s health, namely, Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era should unify the foundation status and the first value orientation of people’s health, so as to promote the cause of people’s health, a better life and build a socialist modernization power in an all-round way.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    HAN Ying, TAO Rui
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2023, 16(2): 149-153. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2023.02.07
    Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC), based on the New Era, the CPC has consistently strengthened Party building. Under the basic principles of the organic unity of theory and practice, the CPC has scientifically planned, accurately taught, and innovatively carried out five centralized educations within the CPC. It echoes the strict governance of the CPC in an all-round way and is linked with the unity consensus of the whole CPC, which have enriched and developed the theory of centralized education within the CPC in the New Era. And it summarizes and deepens the experience and enlightenment that the inner-Party education should focus on the key minority and the theme should be determined around the central task of the CPC in the practical activities, which lays a solid empirical foundation for building a learning, service-oriented and innovative Marxist party.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    YAO Xiao-ya
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2023, 16(1): 41-46. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2023.01.06
    Realizing common prosperity is not only Marx’s beautiful vision for the future society, but also the ideal goal pursued by socialism with Chinese characteristics. On the basis of criticizing the capitalist mode of production, Marx put forward the conception of the future social distribution mode and development trend. Based on the Marxist distribution theory, exploring the realization path of common prosperity has important theoretical value and practical significance. Common prosperity is the inevitable result of fairness in distribution, and it is also an important criterion for measuring fairness in distribution. At present, there are shortage in the distribution field in China, such as low labor remuneration, unfair income, and wide gap between the rich and the poor, which have influenced social equity and delayed the common prosperity of all people. Therefore, the realization of common prosperity in the new era should be based on the premise of high-quality economic development and lay the material foundation for common prosperity, improve the basic economic system as a guarantee and consolidate the institutional foundation for common prosperity, use a sound social security system as a means and better promote common prosperity.
  • Study of Marxism Theories
    JIANG Xu, FENG You-man
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition). 2023, 16(1): 47-56. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2023.01.07
    Since the 18th CPC National Congress, the Party grasps the new changes of times development, puts the realization of common prosperity on an important strategic position, takes effective measures to promote the construction of people’s livelihood projects, and has won a great victory in poverty alleviation. On the occasion of building a well-off society in an all-round way, common prosperity has entered a new historical stage, so it is very necessary to systematically grasp the laws and characteristics of the historical process of common prosperity. Applying CiteSpace visualization software and space-time evolution method, the evolution law of common prosperity theory is discussed from perspective of time, and the evolution characteristics of common prosperity practice is explored from perspective of space. In the historical process of realizing common prosperity, China has formed a theoretical system and action plan different from the modernization path of Western countries, broken the discourse hegemony and development paradigm of Western modernization, and provided Chinese wisdom and Chinese plan for the modernization process of developing countries.
  • DING Chun-fu,QI Ying-peng
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology. 2022, 15(5): 407-412. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2022.05.04
    Achieving Great Dream requires Great Struggle. Since the 18th National Congress of CPC, many important expositions of Great Struggle are made by General Secretary Xi Jinping. The new development of the Sinicization of Marxism of the Communist Party of China, the new summary of 100-year historical experience, and the new thinking of facing the actual contradictions contain its generative logic. The subject, object and method of the Great Struggle constitute its core content. To enrich Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics in the New Era, to provide theoretical guidance for realizing the Chinese Dream of the Great Rejuvenation of the Chinese Nation, and to contribute the Chinese Wisdom and Chinese Scheme of global governance, highlight its value implications.
  • CHEN Yan-chao,WANG Si-yu
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology. 2022, 15(5): 413-418. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2022.05.05
    Socialist Modernization with Chinese Characteristics is a new mode of modernization adhering to the leadership of Communist Party of China, and affinity to people is the fundamental attribute and characteristic of it. As a main line, affinity to people runs through the strategic arrangement, institutional design and the Party’s line, principles and policies during the development of Socialist Modernization with Chinese Characteristics. The specific manifestations are as follows: realizing people-centered, co-constructed and shared and common prospered socialist modernization purposefully and designedly under the leadership of the Communist Party of China; the Socialist System with Chinese Characteristics provides a comprehensive guarantee for the realization of the people’s rights and interests; the Party always put the people at the top of its mind, and implement a series of policies to benefit the people in order to improve their well-being.
  • YANG Li-zhi,SUN Lu-liang
    Journal of Shenyang University of Technology. 2022, 15(5): 419-425. https://doi.org/10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2022.05.06
    The grassroots discourse system of spirit of Communist Party of China is a discourse system for propagating and explaining the great spirit of the Party to the grassroots people, and is a collection of discourses in which the spirit of the Party is expressed at the grassroots level. Since entering the New Era, the grassroots discourse system of spirit of Communist Party of China is facing many challenges, such as the grassroots match degree still needs to be improved, the image appeal of the Party still needs to be strengthened, the foreign reactionary thoughts have a bigger impact on the ideological field of China, and the discourse communication force still needs to be enhanced, etc. In combination with the new characteristics and requirements of the New Era, the discourse content should be further enriched and expanded, the expression forms should be innovated and improved, the communication carrier platform should be optimized, and the evaluation and feedback mechanism should be improved. The construction of spiritual grassroots discourse system of the Communist Party of China should be speeded up, which is rich in Chinese characteristics, meets the needs of the times and conforms to the trend of the times. The influence and appeal of discourse should be enhanced, so as to make the great spirit of the Party to be the value consensus and practice criterion of the masses.