Current Issue

  • Select all
    |
  • FANG Guangshun, XU Bo, WU Gaojie
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    Developing an advanced socialist culture necessitates a firm commitment to the people-centered approach in cultural work, the core of which lies in ensuring the guiding role of Marxism and adhering to the direction of “serving the people and socialism” in developing an advanced culture. This paper examines the theoretical implication, value orientation, and strength consolidation of the people-centered approach through three dimensions of theoretical understanding, value guidance, and sources of strength. It underscores the importance of strengthening consciousness in adhering to this approach and fully implementing Xi Jinping Thought on Culture; upholding the values of educating people through culture and driving development via cultural advancement, while properly balancing the relationships between cultural undertakings and cultural industries, social benefits and economic benefits, and the quantity and quality of cultural products; maintaining the Party′s leadership over cultural work, adhering to the “Two Integrations”, deepening the reform of cultural systems and mechanisms, and stimulating the vitality of cultural innovation and creation.
  • ZHOU Jun, WANG Jing
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    Cultural subjectivity refers to the independence, autonomy, self-awareness, and initiative reflected in culture itself. The construction of a socialist culture with Chinese characteristics in the New Era has secured historic achievements and seen historic changes, which stems from the continued adherence of the Communist Party of China (CPC) to cultural subjectivity. Amidst this adherence of cultural subjectivity, maintaining spiritual independence has laid a solid foundation for the Party′s governance, the people have exerted tremendous creative power, fine traditional Chinese culture has endowed it with profound cultural genes, and the reform and opening up have stimulated surging innovation vitality. At a new critical historical juncture, sticking to cultural subjectivity requires unwaveringly adhering to the Party′s leadership in steering the direction of cultural development; respecting the people′s central role and unleashing the cultural creativity of the people; drawing the nourishment of fine traditional Chinese culture and continuously promoting the creative transformation and innovative development of traditional culture; and further comprehensively deepening reforms and achieving the prosperity and flourishing of Chinese culture in an open and inclusive environment.
  • ZHOU Yanfei, LIU Quanbei
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    In the process of digital government construction, online government services are the core application scenarios of digital government. Driven by technological innovation, government services are undergoing profound changes from in-person procedures to online services and from fragmented governance to coordinated governance. This paper explores the digital governance mechanism of government services from the perspective of modernizing the national governance system and governance capacity, aiming to optimize the digital governance of government services. Based on this, it innovatively constructs a three-dimensional analysis framework of “technology-organization-space” to examine governance dilemmas from the perspectives of technology empowerment, organizational collaboration, and spatial restructuring. Currently, the digital governance of government services faces three major dilemmas: at the technological level, multiple standards and security issues coexist; at the organizational level, personnel resistance and mechanism imbalance coexist; at the spatial level, capability differences and supply mismatch coexist. To respond to the people-centered philosophy of development requirements and continuously enhance the sense of fulfillment and happiness of the people, the following advancement ideas should be adhered to: firstly, in terms of governance capacity, make good use of modern information technology; secondly, in terms of governance system, promote the construction of an integrated government; thirdly, in terms of governance concept, deepen two-way interaction by orienting services toward public demand. Based on this, this paper clarifies the following optimization paths for the digital governance of government services: firstly, improve the technology integration mechanism and enhance the full lifecycle governance of data; secondly, deepen the coordination and transformation of government departments and improve the ability and quality of government personnel; thirdly, balance the supply and demand relationship of government services and improve the inclusive interaction mechanism. In the future, the digital governance of government services needs to pay attention to technology ethics and fairness, continuously promote the iterative development of digital governance of government services, and provide support for modernizing the national governance system and governance capacity.
  • HUANG Bo, WU Han
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    The development of digital villages, as a key component of the rural revitalization strategy, is receiving increasing attention. Taking New Quality Productive Forces as the core analytical perspective and focusing on their three major characteristics of “high technology, high efficiency, and high quality”, this paper systematically explains how New Quality Productive Forces can reconstruct the digital rural governance system through an integrated innovation path, address the current disconnection between technology applications and governance needs, and ultimately promote the formation of a new digital rural governance pattern characterized by digital-intelligence integration, collaborative governance, and value-oriented goodness. Based on a systematic observation of digital rural governance practices, this paper constructs an analytical framework including five dimensions: industrial upgrading, resource integration, cultural identification, subject vitality activation, and model optimization, to deeply reveal the underlying mechanism through which New Quality Productive Forces empower digital rural governance. The findings show that New Quality Productive Forces, by injecting innovative technological elements, systematically transform traditional governance links, and promote the deep integration of the governance system at three levels: first, the “dual intelligence integration” of “artificial intelligence+the people′s wisdom”, achieving the local adaptation of technology and precise guidance of governance direction; second, the “dual line integration” of “online+offline”, expanding the spatial dimension of governance and enhancing the coverage and response efficiency of service supply; third, the “dual network integration” of “Party building network+governance grid”, effectively stimulating the participation of multiple subjects in collective actions and strengthening governance synergy. With its strong adaptability and innovativeness, New Quality Productive Forces foster a new development pattern in digital rural governance, achieving an organic unity of technological empowerment, institutional optimization, and value guidance. This paper not only enriches the research system of New Quality Productive Forces and digital rural governance at the theoretical level, promoting the theoretical integration between technological innovation and institutional evolution, but also proposes practical and feasible development paths at the practical level, providing valuable references for modernizing rural governance and exploring a rural revitalization path with Chinese characteristics.
  • FAN Weifeng, DI Yunqing
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    Digital technology, as a significant force reshaping social structures, exhibits an unanticipated phenomenon of involution in grassroots governance, termed “growth without development”. Based on the theoretical framework of involution, this paper employs methods such as literature analysis and theoretical deduction to systematically define involution in grassroots digital governance. It delves into and reveals the formation logic and mechanism of involution from four dimensions: administration, market, organization, and culture. This paper finds that involution in grassroots digital governance manifests as goal involution characterized by competition upgrades of digital symbols, mode involution marked by governance paradigm homogenization, construction involution featuring redundant investment in digital infrastructure, and technology involution characterized by the instrumental alienation of application systems. These primarily stem from pressure from digital tournaments in the administrative dimension, the logic of technological capital proliferation in the market dimension, administrative barriers due to compartmentalization in the organizational dimension, and the prevalence of “technology fetishism” in the cultural dimension. To escape from this dilemma, it is essential to fundamentally shift from a “material-oriented logic” to a “human-oriented logic”. This involves returning to the people′s standpoint from a value perspective, promoting the reconstruction of powers and responsibilities at the structural level, guiding the synergy between technological rationality and public welfare at the market level, and cultivating pragmatic technological concepts at the cultural level. This approach aims to ensure that digital governance truly enhances governance efficiency and social welfare. This paper provides new theoretical perspectives and practical paths for identifying and eliminating digital formalism and modernizing grassroots digital governance.
  • WU Dingyu, HU Dingguo, ZHANG Zhijue, YANG Baiqiang
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    In the context of major changes unseen in a century, opportunities and risks coexist. Organizational resilience, which refers to an enterprise′s ability to resist, respond to, and recover from internal and external shocks and challenges, is a key support and guarantee for the high-quality development of enterprises. With the rapid development of the digital economy, the connection between digital transformation and organizational resilience has become increasingly close. To deeply study the impact of enterprise digital transformation on organizational resilience and further explore the mediating and moderating roles of dual innovation and corporate social responsibility in this relationship, based on the dynamic capability theory, this paper takes listed manufacturing companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets from 2010 to 2022 as samples and uses multiple regression methods for empirical testing. This paper finds that enterprise digital transformation can significantly enhance organizational resilience. Notably, the impact of each stage of enterprise digital transformation on organizational resilience varies, with the basic data layout in the initial stage exhibiting the greatest positive impact. Moreover, the impact of enterprise digital transformation on organizational resilience also shows industry heterogeneity, with the technology-intensive industry demonstrating the greatest impact, followed by the capital-intensive industry, and the labor-intensive industry showing no significant effect. Further analysis reveals that enterprise digital transformation can significantly enhance organizational resilience through dual innovation, and corporate social responsibility positively moderates the promoting effect of enterprise digital transformation on dual innovation. In the mediation effect test, exploitative innovation plays a dominant role, with its contribution far exceeding that of exploratory innovation, and it is the key path for digital transformation to enhance organizational resilience. The research conclusions not only deepen enterprises′ understanding of the mechanism of the interaction between digital transformation and organizational resilience, encouraging them to accelerate the process of digital transformation, but also provide useful decision-making references for government departments to formulate effective policies.
  • CAI Wu, DONG Zhaolin
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    Under the external environment of tense international situations and slow economic recovery, China has encountered challenges such as weak domestic effective demand and increased risks in key areas. These uncertainties not only test the adaptability of the economic system, but also place greater demands for its sustainable development. It is of great significance to enhance the risk resistance and stability of the economic system, that is, economic resilience. As an efficient, intelligent, and sustainable social support system, the new-type infrastructure serves as an important way to enhance urban economic resilience. Based on the urban panel data from 2011 to 2021, this paper empirically examines the direct effects, mechanisms, and spatial spillover effects of the construction of new-type infrastructure on urban economic resilience by using the two-way fixed effects model, the chain mediation effect model, and the spatial econometric model. The results show that the construction of new-type infrastructure significantly enhances urban economic resilience, and this result holds across robustness tests. Mechanism tests show that the construction of new-type infrastructure indirectly plays an enabling role by strengthening innovation capabilities and accelerating digital transformation, and there is a chain mediation effect whereby innovation capability improvement promotes digital transformation, which in turn boosts urban economic resilience. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the impact of construction of new-type infrastructure on economic resilience is the most pronounced in the eastern cities, followed by western cities, while the impact is least evident in central cities. In addition, the results of spatial econometric regression show that the construction of new-type infrastructure exhibits a significant positive spatial spillover effect on urban economic resilience. From the perspective of promoting innovation and digital transformation, this paper analyzes and verifies the specific mechanisms and effects through which the construction of new-type infrastructure enhances urban economic resilience, enriching the relevant research on urban economic resilience. Based on these findings, this paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to improve urban economic resilience, including strengthening support for the construction of new-type infrastructure, stimulating innovation vitality, facilitating digital transformation, improving the spatial layout of and promoting regional coordination in the construction of new-type infrastructure, and giving full play to the spillover effect of new-type infrastructure.
  • WANG Shenghui, SHAO Changheng
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    Against the backdrop that the modern production system dominated by the logic of capital is confronted with multiple predicaments such as ecological crises, social differentiation, and the alienation of technological innovation, this paper explores how New Quality Productive Forces can achieve a systematic transcendence of the traditional productivity paradigm through theoretical reconstruction, value transformation, and practical breakthroughs, and construct a new path for the evolution of new productive forces with the all-round development of human beings as the core. Based on the Marxist theory of capital critique, this paper constructs a three-dimensional analytical framework of “deconstruction of logic of capital-reconstruction of humanistic values-global practical innovation”. Through the theoretical analysis of the paradox of capital appreciation, this paper reveals the inherent limitations of the development of traditional productive forces; using the methodology of dialectical materialism, it explains the interaction mechanism between the reorganization of production factors and the transformation of production relations; and combining practical cases of global technological revolution and institutional changes, it demonstrates the path for New Quality Productive Forces to transcend the logic of capital. In the theoretical dimension, New Quality Productive Forces break free from the constraints of the logic of capital, representing a creative development of Marxist productive forces theory while maintaining its fundamental principles. In the value dimension, New Quality Productive Forces embody the value of people′s free and all-round development, integrate fairness and efficiency, and pursue intergenerational equity and ecological balance. In the practical dimension, New Quality Productive Forces rely on scientific and technological as well as institutional innovation to expand global cooperation, break through traditional growth paths, optimize resource allocation, and enhance international competitiveness and influence. The essence of New Quality Productive Forces lies in the dialectical sublation of the logic of capital:at the philosophical level, it realizes the leap from instrumental rationality to value rationality, transforming technological development from a tool for capital appreciation into a vehicle for the realization of human freedom; at the economic level, it reconstructs the “production-distribution-consumption” closed loop, and corrects market failures through data right confirmation and ecological pricing mechanisms; at the sociological level, it promotes the transformation of labor form from alienated labor to creative labor, and constructs a unified framework for individual development and social progress. This paper proposes a paradigm of dialectical reconstruction of productive forces at the theoretical level, revealing the law of spiral evolution of technological revolution and institutional innovation; constructs a “three-dimensional justice” theory (distributive justice, ecological justice, and intergenerational justice) at the value level, expanding the evaluation criteria of productive forces from economic efficiency to the overall dimension of human development; and puts forward a chain-based innovation community at the practical level, explaining the synergistic mechanism of technological diffusion, institutional adaptation, and global governance, so as to seek the development path of Chinese modernization.
  • WANG Xinger, DING Yihao
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    Western modernization, driven by the logic of capital accumulation, adopts an instrumentalist attitude towards nature. In the process of one-way resource extraction and the instrumentalization of development, it has exceeded the ecological threshold of society, leading to the disruption of the structure and function of the ecosystem. In the face of the ecological crisis, Western ecological civilization concepts such as ecocentrism and ecological Marxism have emerged. To a certain extent, they have improved social ecological systems and concepts, but they have never been able to transcend the institutional framework of capitalist relations of production, showing characteristics of incompleteness. The ecological lessons from Western modernization have prompted China to explore a Chinese modernization path that pursues both social progress and ecological justice. By inheriting and carrying forward the ecological wisdom from fine traditional Chinese culture, the Marxist ecological view, and the ecological civilization theory formed during China′s socialist construction, a governance framework of the modernization of harmony between humanity and nature has been proposed and continuously refined in practice. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the Party Central Committee with Comrade Xi Jinping at its core has attached great importance to ecological conservation, unswervingly followed the path of ecological priority and green development, and promoted the establishment of a community of life where humanity and nature are interdependent, a development community where the economy and the environment advance in tandem, and a community with a shared future for mankind where the world work hand in hand. This new form of civilization not only transcends the logic of capital from an ecological perspective, but also strengthens the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind, providing a brand-new paradigm for global environmental governance.
  • QIN Zihan
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    The “Second Integration” has a critical position in Xi Jinping Thought on Culture. In 2023, Xi Jinping, general secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, pointed out at the meeting on cultural inheritance and development that the “Second Integration” is another ideological liberation. The historical dimension possesses a more profound and distinctive connotation in the exploration of the “Second Integration”, and there exists room for interpreting and excavating related theoretical issues. By reviewing and analyzing Marxist classics and research achievements in related fields, and using the basic principles of historical materialism and Marxist cultural theory, this paper further explains the historical dimension of freeing the mind through the “Second Integration”, and obtains the unique significance of the “Second Integration” in terms of connotation innovation, historical coordinates and historical viewpoints, which can enrich the academic circle′s comprehension regarding the historical dimension of Xi Jinping Thought on Culture. In the history of freeing the mind of the Chinese nation, the “Second Integration” exhibits the universal characteristics of freeing the mind, and also endows the ideological emancipation with a new era significance based on the reality of the field, showing the unique meaning of the “Second Integration” as another ideological liberation. In terms of the relationship between tradition and modernity, the “Second Integration” has accomplished a Chinese interpretation of modern civilization and a contemporary elucidation of traditional culture, and has dismantled the binary opposition between tradition and modernity with a new cultural entity, showing the historical coordinates of the “Second Integration” between tradition and modernity. In terms of the development of the concept of history of human society, the “Second Integration” has formed a scientific concept of history of human society: the Chinese discourse of historical materialism, which reflects the progress from the leadership of the working class to the broad unity of farmers, realizes the unity of ideological disenchantment and the manifestation of moral conscience, and finds out a new way out of “historical cycle” in the law of the tortuous advancement of the historical trajectory. Further elucidating ideological emancipation implications of the “Second Integration” can not only continue to adapt Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times and promote creative transformation and innovative development of fine traditional Chinese culture, but also further consolidate and demonstrate the identity of Chinese culture. On this basis, it can also achieve a deeper understanding of the originality and historical contribution of Xi Jinping Thought on Culture, and enrich and improve the Chinese discourse system and disciplinary discourse system of Marxist cultural theory, which is of great significance for further learning and implementing Xi Jinping Thought on Culture, and strengthening and improving the propaganda, ideological and cultural work.
  • ZOU Xiaomei, CAI Sijia
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, autonomous driving technology is becoming increasingly mature, and autonomous vehicles that require no human drivers have turned from an idea into reality. How fully algorithm-based automatic decision-making should handle the trade-off of life interests between passengers inside the vehicle and pedestrians outside the vehicle in a collision has become an unavoidable issue. By comprehensively applying relevant theories in ethics, jurisprudence, and technical norms for artificial intelligence, as well as the classic case of the “trolley problem”, this paper aims to justify the priority protection principle of passengers in the algorithmic ethics of autonomous vehicles. The establishment of algorithmic ethics of autonomous driving is mainly faced with three problems:how to comply with the moral legitimacy, how to coordinate with the industry, and how to embed ethics into algorithms. The “trolley problem” provides ideological resources for the study of algorithmic ethics of autonomous driving, but the “autonomous driving dilemma” contains a complexity of propositions that is not entirely the same as all typical scenarios of the traditional “trolley problem”. This paper argues for the legitimacy of autonomous driving systems prioritizing the protection of passengers in extreme situations from the perspectives of the special status of passengers, limited altruism, humans as ends rather than means, and market demand, and holds that the priority protection of passengers should be restricted by the principle of the greatest good. In the context of the “autonomous driving dilemma”, algorithms should prioritize the protection of passengers; in cases where a greater good is generated, passengers may be subjected to permissible harm, provided that such harm is reasonable and not purely instrumental. It is proposed that algorithmic ethics disclosure based on mandatory algorithmic ethics settings is a more reasonable way of embedding ethics into algorithms compared to users′ “personalized settings”. Taking the traditional ethical and legal puzzle of the “trolley problem” as an entry point, this paper compares its similarities and differences with the “autonomous driving dilemma”, in order to provide a feasible solution to the collision order problem faced by autonomous vehicles.
  • SHANG Haitao, LIANG Ziwen
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    With the help of “deep learning” and “generative adversarial networks”, the deep synthesis technology has developed into a disruptive technology in the field of artificial intelligence, characterized by high authenticity, technological simplicity, and a broad user base. Deep synthesis technology is closely integrated with social application scenarios, which not only improves transaction efficiency and life convenience, but also poses risks such as personal privacy leakage, disruption of competitive order, and even threats to national security due to technology spillover. Government regulation characterized by “command-control” considers not enough the uncertainty and complexity of technological applications, while self-regulation characterized by freedom may lead to the abuse of private power. This paper proposes the application of meta-regulation to reconcile the conflict between original regulatory modes and the development of deep synthesis technology, and advocating the critical reflection on self-regulation, which is beneficial for responding to the risks and hidden dangers brought by deep synthesis technology. The meta-regulation for deep synthesis technology requires the construction of information disclosure and negotiation and communication mechanisms, the establishment of a co-governance mechanism involving multiple regulatory entities, the refinement of full-lifecycle regulatory procedures, and the improvement of risk assessment and accountability systems, so as to achieve a dynamic balance between scientific and technological development and risk prevention.
  • ZHANG Yaowen
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    The introduction of the concept of private information is one of the highlights of the Civil Code. Discussions on the protection mode, reasonable utilization, and application of protection rules for private information must be based on the identification of private information. Private information differs from general personal information in terms of the rights basis, content characteristics, and information processing rules, necessitating higher-level protection under privacy norms. Private information and sensitive personal information belong to different classification methods. Though they are not clearly distinguished, they cannot be equated. In terms of connotation, private information is distinguished by its secrecy, while sensitive information is marked by the high probability of causing psychological distress to the data subject upon disclosure. In terms of extension, the two exhibit a close relationship and often overlap each other. Typical private information is also sensitive. In terms of legislative value, Private information helps to categorize different types of privacy, distinguishing between privacy rights and personal information protection, while sensitive information helps to categorize within personal information protection. To break the dilemma of identifying private information: on one hand,typical private information should beexplicitly listed, including financial information, personal history, medical and health data, biometric data, and genetic information. On the other hand, based on the social context theory, less apparent private information should be identified on a case-by-case basis, adhering to the principle of balancing data circulation and utilization with the protection of personal dignity. This entails a thorough assessment of factors including societal consensus, application scenarios, information content, data scale, processing methods, and potential harm. This paper categorizes typical private information, proposes a personalized approach to identifying private information based on social context theory, and concurrently facilitates the active disposition and reasonable utilization of private information. It bridges the privacy provisions of the Civil Code with the reasonable utilization system under the Personal Information Protection Law. Furthermore, through the concept of the information chain within social context theory, this paper elucidates how algorithms in the digital era influence the identification of private information.