Marxism in Contemporary China
PANG Hongmei, ZHANG Haibing
People-centered rural governance is an inevitable requirement for advancing the rural revitalization strategy in the New Era. It represents a concrete practice of translating the people-first philosophy into rural governance practices and a critical strategic measure for building a modern rural governance system. At its core, this philosophy is underpinned by three interrelated logics. First, in terms of theoretical logic, it is rooted in the principle of the people as the subject of historical materialism and time-honored people-centered rural wisdom, laying the theoretical foundation for respecting villagers′ principal position. Second, in terms of historical logic, it carries forward the people-centeredness tradition forged in the community-level governance of the Communist Party of China (CPC). From the establishment of villagers′ principal position after the founding of the People′s Republic of China, to the governance transformation responsive to farmers′ needs following the launch of reform and opening up, and to the full integration of the people-first philosophy into rural governance since the 18th CPC National Congress, the people-centeredness of rural governance has demonstrated clear historical continuity. Third, in terms of practical logic, it is driven by people′s diverse needs for a better life, prompting continuous improvements in the quality and efficiency of rural governance. Such a philosophy has shown strong vitality in practice, supported by the distinctive strengths inherent in the rural governance system with Chinese characteristics. First, Party building leadership serves as the political underpinning, providing strategic direction and overall coordination to ensure targeted policy implementation and translate the Party′s purpose of exercising governance for the people into tangible results. Second, prioritizing people′s wellbeing constitutes its value orientation, with villagers′ satisfaction as the fundamental criterion for evaluating governance performance. Third, collaborative participation acts as the wellspring of vitality, breaking the constraints of unilateral government administration and advancing collaboration, participation, and shared benefits to make governance more democratic and effective. To further deepen this approach, efforts should focus on three dimensions. First, the foundation for collaboration should be consolidated by strengthening the leadership and coordination of village Party organizations, leveraging the synergistic, enabling role of the government and the market, and giving full play to the role of villagers as the main participants, so as to form a governance system where everyone takes their responsibilities. Second, the synergy for participation should be fostered by cementing the ideological foundation for multi-stakeholder collaborative participation, enhancing collaborative participation capacity, and strengthening digital empowerment, to develop a governance model where everyone fulfills their responsibilities. Third, the sharing of development gains should be advanced by improving equitable sharing mechanisms, ensuring inclusive and comprehensive benefits, and perfecting a distribution system where everyone shares in the benefits.